These Shocking Reasons are Why the Big Bang Theory Doesn’t Make Sense to Some Conspiracy Theorists

The Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted cosmological model of the origin and evolution of the universe. According to this theory, the universe began as a tiny, dense, and hot point of energy, called a singularity, that exploded and expanded rapidly about 13.8 billion years ago. The explosion created space, time, matter, and radiation, and set the stage for the formation of stars, galaxies, planets, and life.

Why Some Conspiracy Theorists Think the Big Bang Theory Doesn’t Make Sense

But does the Big Bang theory really make sense? Is it a valid explanation of how the universe came to be, or is it a misleading simplification of a more complex and mysterious reality?

We want to explore some of the problems and paradoxes that arise from the Big Bang theory, and question whether it can truly account for the origin of everything. If you’re one of those inquiring minds who is fascinated with thinking about how the Universe was created, you might want to read on.

What Caused the Big Bang?

One of the most fundamental questions that the Big Bang theory fails to answer is what caused the singularity to explode in the first place. What was the trigger or the mechanism that initiated the Big Bang? And what was the nature and origin of the singularity itself?

Some scientists have proposed various hypotheses to explain the cause of the Big Bang, such as quantum fluctuations, inflation, string theory, multiverse, or cyclic models. However, none of these hypotheses are proven or universally accepted, and they often raise more questions than they answer.

For example, if the Big Bang was caused by a quantum fluctuation, then what was the quantum field that fluctuated?

If the Big Bang was the result of inflation, then what was the inflaton field that drove the exponential expansion? If the Big Bang was a manifestation of string theory, then what was the origin and structure of the strings?

If the Big Bang was a part of a multiverse, then what was the nature and origin of the other universes? If the Big Bang was a cycle of a larger cosmic process, then what was the origin and fate of that process?

In other words, whatever hypothesis we choose to explain the cause of the Big Bang, we still have to ask what caused that hypothesis. And then we have to ask what caused the cause of that hypothesis, and so on. This leads to an infinite regress of causes, which is logically unsatisfying and impossible to verify.

What Was Before the Big Bang?

Another question that the Big Bang theory fails to answer is what was before the singularity exploded. What was the state of existence before space, time, matter, and radiation were created? Was there anything at all, or was there absolute nothingness?

Most scientists would say that there was nothing before the Big Bang, and that the question itself is meaningless, since time itself began with the Big Bang. However, this answer is not satisfactory, as it does not explain what “nothing” means, and how something can come from nothing.

What do we mean by nothing? Do we mean the absence of matter, energy, space, and time? Do we mean the absence of physical laws, constants, and principles?

Do we mean the absence of logic, mathematics, and information? Do we mean the absence of consciousness, awareness, and perception? Do we mean the absence of existence itself?

And how can something come from nothing? How can the singularity, which contained all the energy and potential of the universe, emerge from nothing?

How can the physical laws, constants, and principles that govern the universe arise from nothing? How can the logic, mathematics, and information that underlie the universe emerge from nothing?

How can the consciousness, awareness, and perception that experience the universe arise from nothing? How can existence itself come from nothing?

These questions are beyond the scope of our current scientific understanding, and perhaps beyond the scope of our human reality. It seems impossible for the Big Bang to come from nothing, so did it really create the universe, or is it just a convenient way of describing something that we cannot comprehend?

What Is Beyond the Big Bang?

A final question that the Big Bang theory fails to answer is what is beyond the singularity that exploded. What is the extent and limit of the universe that resulted from the Big Bang? What is the nature and origin of the reality that encompasses the universe?

According to the Big Bang theory, the universe is expanding and accelerating, and its size and age are finite. However, this does not imply that the universe is bounded or isolated. There may be more to reality than the observable universe, and there may be more to existence than physical reality.

What is beyond the observable universe? Is there a boundary or an edge to the universe, or is it infinite and eternal? Is there a center or a direction to the universe, or is it isotropic and homogeneous?

Is there a shape or a geometry to the universe, or is it flat and Euclidean? Is there a structure or a pattern to the universe, or is it random and chaotic?

What is beyond physical reality? Is there a higher or a deeper dimension of existence, or is it one and the same? Is there a metaphysical or a spiritual aspect of existence, or is it purely material and natural? Is there a purpose or a meaning to existence, or is it accidental and meaningless?

These questions are beyond the scope of our current observational capabilities, and perhaps beyond the scope of our human imagination. It seems impossible for the Big Bang to be the ultimate origin of the universe, so is it really the beginning of everything, or is it just a part of a larger and more mysterious reality?

The Big Bang theory is a powerful and elegant scientific model that explains many aspects of the universe, such as its age, structure, composition, evolution, and history.

However, it is not a complete and final theory that explains everything about the universe, such as its cause, origin, extent, and limit. There are many problems and paradoxes that arise from the Big Bang theory, and many questions that remain unanswered.

Therefore, some people feel that we should not accept the Big Bang theory as the absolute truth, but rather as a tentative and provisional approximation of the truth. Some conspiracy theorists feel that people should not be dogmatic and closed-minded about the Big Bang theory, but rather be curious and open-minded about the alternatives.